The effects of different bends on performances of wideband digital circuits.

Posted Aug 26, 2010, by Jian Zheng

Print this Post

Tags: EM Simulation, IE3D, Electromagnetic Simulation, RF

1 Comment

Bends presenting on a SERDES channel introduce discontinuity effects. Normally, such effects are caused by the extra capacitance at the corner of a bend. It will add reflections to the channel signal and can generate radiation at higher frequencies. Minimizing discontinuity effects of SERDES channels has become an issue channel designers need to consider.

In RF design applications, engineers have been using bends with chamfered corners to reduce radiation from right angle bends. Will such bend structure also behave better in digital applications and introduce less reflection on signals?

To answer this question, we studied different bend structures (see Figure 1 to Figure 4) and compared their behaviors with short traces without bends. What we found is: for a wide band signal, such as SERDES signals, a particular bend structure may not always provide better behavior than other bend structures over the entire frequency range. In our tests, we used chamfered bend and a bend with round corner. Two bends of each kind are connected to a pair of differential traces with total length of 500mil. The S-parameters of the two nets are extracted using IE3D. For comparison, the differential traces without bends are also modeled with the same 3D field solver.

The results (see attached table and images) show that chamfered bends introduce less reflection than straight differential traces do at low frequencies (see Figure 5). This is because the trace impedance is not maintained at 100-ohms at all frequency points (see Table 1). However, chamfered bend structure has the worst behavior around 10 GHz due to the resonance caused by discontinuities

In conclusion, certain bend structure may introduce less discontinuity effects at certain frequencies. Designers for SERDES channels need to examine entire frequency range of SERDES signals to determine if using one type of bend structure has more advantage than using others.

Table 1: Comparison on the equivalent Zc in different frequency ranges.

 

About Jian Zheng

imageDr. Jian-X Zheng received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Tsinghua University, Beijing China, in 1984 and 1986, respectively, and a Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Colorado at Boulder in 1990. He founded Zeland Software, Inc., specializing in 3D full-wave EM simulation products, in 1993. Dr. Zheng has been leading development of the IE3D Full-Wave EM Design System for a broad range of high-frequency and wide-band electronic design applications. Dr. Zheng has more than 26 years of experience developing full-wave EM technologies. Visit AskJian

More Posts by Jian Zheng

More Blog Posts

Comments (↓ Add Your Own)

1 Comment on this Post

Commented on 5:53 PM, Oct 26, 2010
By Wayne Shanks

Hello Jian I hope Mentor is treating you well. I was interested in your comments on the Breakthrough in Linear solvers at Carnegie Mellon. http://www.cmu.edu/news/archive/2010/October/oct21_speedyalgorithm.shtml this advance could be a revolution for programs like IE3D Wayne S

Add Your Comment

Please complete the following information to comment or sign in.

(Your email will not be published)