Sign In
Forgot Password?
Sign In | | Create Account

Devices that phone home

Colin Walls

Colin Walls

Posted Jul 27, 2009
7 Comments

For some years, there has been discussion about how embedded devices are increasingly becoming connected. WiFi enabled home appliances are one possibility. Everyone has heard about fridges that order the groceries. I love the concept of the Internet enabled toaster, which checks the weather forecast and burns a symbol onto your morning toast to tell you what to expect.

All of this is great, exciting even, and we are moving in this direction, but there are other possibilities that have hardly been touched yet. There are a few issues with WiFi devices: they need to be in range of a wireless network, they consume quite a lot of power and their implementation may be overly complex, if only small amounts of data need to be transferred and that transfer is just unidirectional. There must be another way …

What about cellular telephone technology? We think in terms of cell phones as being devices that let two people talk or exchange text messages. But there is no reason why one or both of the communicating parties could not be machines.

Let me posit a real world example. My father is 80 years old and has a heart condition. He visits hospitals for regular checks, but cannot be monitored 24/7 without totally constraining his lifestyle. He would benefit greatly from having a device that constantly monitored his heart function and periodically sent the critical data [via an SMS - enough capacity, cheap, low tech and easy] to his doctor. He could then be recalled if worrying trends were observed. Maybe it could go a step further: if the device also had GPS functionality, it could be programmed to detect a serious problem and automatically place the 911 [or, in the UK, 999 or 112] call. I would be very pleased to buy one of these for my Dad’s 81st birthday.

Why are such devices not yet available? Or, at least, not widely so. A significant reason is the complexity of putting all the parts together. In software terms, there is the need to integrate the cellular communications stack with an OS and build applications on top of that. This is all possible, but somewhat specialized and expensive. The current results of such efforts are high end smart phones.Android

Things are changing. Unless you have been living in a cave for the last year, you cannot fail to have heard of the Google Android platform. This open source software provides a pre-built integration of cellular communications and an OS, with a well defined application interface.

So, what is the problem? My credit card awaits.

There will be more on Linux and Android in this blog in the weeks to come, as Mentor has just announced its strategy. I will be interested in your comments.

Android, Medical, Wireless, Wi-Fi

More Blog Posts

About Colin Walls Follow on Twitter

Colin WallsI have over twenty-five years experience in the electronics industry, largely dedicated to embedded software. A frequent presenter at conferences and seminars and author of numerous technical articles and two books on embedded software, I am a member of the marketing team of the Mentor Graphics Embedded Systems Division, and am based in the UK. Away from work, I have a wide range of interests including photography and trying to point my two daughters in the right direction in life. Learn more about Colin, including his go-to karaoke song and the best parts of being British: http://go.mentor.com/3_acv Visit The Colin Walls Blog

More Posts by Colin Walls

Comments 7

Post a Comment
Great ideas... I am surprised at the coincidence that few days ago I was discussing similar ideas (wireless communication devices) with my friend to make final year project for my graduation in Electrical Engineering. We were thinking to make a First-Aid Robot... Although we found very ineffective substitute of manly first-aid but we got a hope to explore this functionality and feature in other ways. Then we came to the idea of robot nurse.... it was also not a good substitute of actual nurses (and definitely a robot can never be substitute of compassionate female nurse for men... :) )... Then we stopped thinking after failure of getting feasibilty and pragmatism out of these few ideas... Buh now after reading your blog a passion to rejuvenate these ideas is hitting my mind... I hope I will think on it... and could come up to an idea having similar effectiveness as you want... Regards

Zeeshan Mahmood
12:54 PM Jul 27, 2009

Freescale has some very cool applications and white papers in the area of personal medical devices: http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/homepage.jsp?nodeId=02Qt1s Many of these propose Zigbee and/or Bluetooth as a means of communicating to another device, such as as cell phone to transmit data remotely. Particularly interesting to your post is a video featured in that page called: Freescale and Monebo's ECG-On-a-Chip. -- Eduardo http://embeddedstories.wordpress.com

Eduardo
2:40 AM Jul 28, 2009

Good input. Thanks Eduardo.

Colin Walls
7:31 AM Jul 28, 2009

I noticed this recently and it reminded me of your blog: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/10/internet_connected_pacemaker/ Regards

Jason
9:52 PM Aug 10, 2009

Thanks for the link Jason - interesting. A significant step on from the use of inductive communication.

Colin Walls
8:04 AM Aug 11, 2009

Intel has an FDA approved device that just does what you suggest & then some: http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20081110corp.htm UK: http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/intels-home-medical-device-makes-its-uk-debut

Nilanjan Palit
7:15 PM Sep 2, 2009

Nilanjan: This is a very interesting development, but not quite what I had in mind, which would be portable and much, much smaller.

Colin Walls
9:23 AM Sep 3, 2009

Add Your Comment

Please complete the following information to comment or sign in.

(Your email will not be published)

Archives

 
Online Chat