IC Design Blog

Posts tagged with 'IC Verification'

IBM Addresses Leakage

Posted Nov 20, 2009, by David Abercrombie

In case you missed the webinar by Jim Culp on November 3rd, I wanted to give you an opportunity to see what you missed. Jim is a Senior Engineer in IBM’s Advanced Physical Design and Technology Integration team. He is leading a team in the development of Parametric DFM and the mitigation of Circuit Limited Yield (CLY). During the webinar he discussed how CLY is becoming the leading contributor to yield … Read More

Tags: Power, Physical Verification, Yield, Design Quality, Design for Manufacturing, IC Verification, Leakage, DRC, IC Design

DFM for Non-PhD's: Part 3 - Real Life Examples

Posted Aug 20, 2009, by David Abercrombie

I got some questions from my last installment of this series asking for some pictures of defects that caused yield issues in production that could have been avoided during design. It struck me that most designers probably never get a chance to see the manufacturing problems their designs encounter. Since my background is in the fab, I wrongly assumed everyone had lived through the same pain as myself. … Read More

Tags: Reliability, IC Verification, Yield, Design Quality, Design for Manufacturing, Scoring, Design Rules, IC Design, Physical Verification, Design Rule Checking

David's DAC09 - White Paper Session

Posted Aug 4, 2009, by David Abercrombie

I felt privileged this year to get a paper accepted into the technical track at DAC. It seems more and more difficult to get something through. I think they said they only had a 20% acceptance rate this year. I was glad to get to present this one because it was fun doing the experimentation for it and I think it helps answer one of the nagging questions I always get about eqDRC. I worked with Fedor … Read More

Tags: IC Verification, IC Design, DAC, Design Quality, Design for Manufacturing, Design Rules, DRC, Physical Verification, Design Rule Checking

David's DAC09 - Another Special Guest

Posted Jul 31, 2009, by David Abercrombie

Well, day two of DAC started a little earlier than the first day. I had to attend the speakers breakfast for the paper I was going to give later that day. However, after breakfast I had my 9am suite presentation on eqDRC again and I also had a special guest again. This time it was Robert Boone from Freescale in Austin, TX. He works in the DFM team and he also agreed to come tell everyone what he and … Read More

Tags: Reliability, IC Verification, Yield, Physical Verification, Design for Manufacturing, DAC, DRC, IC Design, Improvability, Design Rule Checking, Design Rules

David's DAC09 - Off to a great start!

Posted Jul 28, 2009, by David Abercrombie

Well it felt familiar to be back in San Francisco for DAC this year. However, I wasn’t ready for the cold. It was 100 degrees in Portland when I left and I always assume the Bay area will be warmer. Luckily I looked at the weather map before I finished packing and replaced my short sleeve shirts with long sleeve ones. I didn’t get in until late Sunday night so I only had time for a dinner in the Westin … Read More

Tags: IC Verification, IC Design, Yield, Design Quality, Design for Manufacturing, DAC, Design Rules, Leakage, DRC, Physical Verification, Power, Design Rule Checking

To Waive Or Not To Waive?

Posted Jul 2, 2009, by David Abercrombie

That is the question! If you read my colleague John’s most recent posting “Waive of the future?”, you will understand the question. I was equally shocked as John to find that almost no one tapes out DRC clean anymore. I would add one other reason to John’s list as to why this has happened. I think the traditional DRC rules are broken. Please read my first post “Are Design Rules Broken?” for my stance … Read More

Tags: IC Verification, IC Design, Design Quality, Design for Manufacturing, Design Rules, DRC, Physical Verification, Design Rule Checking

DFM for Non-PhD's: Part 2 - Reliability

Posted Jun 19, 2009, by David Abercrombie

One of the fundamental questions everyone asks about DFM is “why should I do it?” On the one hand this always strikes me as a funny question. I always look at DFM in the same way I think of automobile safety. Statistically, most people never get in a serious accident. So why would you spend so much money on airbags, antilock brakes, better seat belts, side door reinforcements, traction control, etc. … Read More

Tags: Yield, Design Quality, Design for Manufacturing, IC Verification, Reliability, Physical Verification, IC Design

DFM for Non-PhDs

Posted Jun 5, 2009, by David Abercrombie

I got a kick out of Rohan’s comment on my previous blog (How do you define DFM?).  It is too easy to assume that anyone knows what you are talking about when you say DFM.  Just because everyone has been talking about it doesn’t mean any of them know what they are talking about. You could probably infer from my approach to the previous blog that my background is primarily on the manufacturing side. … Read More

Tags: Design Quality, Design for Manufacturing, Reliability, Yield, IC Design, IC Verification