Sign In
Forgot Password?
Sign In | | Create Account

Heat Your Home Office for 8p a Day. Part 3a - Was Dave Right?

It’s always nice to get some comments on your blog. When starting writing blogs about 4 years ago I was told that so long as you write about something that you’re interested in, then others will read it. Comments are the echo to what otherwise would be a Demosthenes type shouting at a roaring sea of disinterest. So when a colleague here at Mentor, Dave Roberts, commented on Part 3 of this series as to whether the flower pots might act as storage heaters and thus provide additional value, I was obliged to use simulation to investigate this.

Storage heaters work on the concept of soaking up heat from cheap night time electricity in a high thermal mass matrix (posh way of saying ‘bricks’). They weigh a tonne (almost literally). Then, throughout the day that heat leaks out to warm the room. If the heaters have lost all their heat by the next night time charge then it’s a very efficient way if distributing the cheap heat (in time and space). They do have their downside, they tend to heat the room up less as they lose more heat, later in the day the room temperature does tend to drop as there’s not much heat left to leak out of them.

Not being on the gas mains, such storage heaters form the main part of the heating of my family’s house. And yes, some of them are placed under the windows, but not enough!

Dave Roberts, FloTHERM/FloVENT QA Engineer

Back to Dave’s Question. Easy enough to do in FloVENT, simply deactivate the object that represents the flame and continue the full 3D CFD transient simulation on from the 4 hour point it reached with the candles on. This time let’s just look at how the air at the top of the room and the air at the bottom of the room change after the candles have gone out.

With no flower pots the air temperature drops down pretty quickly after the candles go out. What little heat is left in the air is quickly drained out through the still cold walls.

With the flower pots in place there is a very marked improvement. All those Joules of energy stored in the ceramic continue to leak out to the room, well after the candles have gone out, supporting the air temperature and reducing it’s inevitable cooling down. Even after an hour the air temperature rise is about twice what it would have been otherwise.

A double whammy of not only trapping over 15% more of the power that would have been lost directly to the walls without flower pots but also storing this extra heat to extend the benefit of the flower pot heater arrangement well beyond the four hour life time of the tea lights.

I’m hoping for a triple whammy when we come to look at the actual ‘felt’ temperature, more on that in the next part.

9th December 2014, Ross-on-Wye

Heat Your Home Office for 8p a Day, HVAC, FloVENT, thermal comfort

More Blog Posts

About Robin Bornoff Follow on Twitter

Robin BornoffRobin Bornoff achieved a Mechanical Engineering Degree from Brunel University in 1992 followed by a PhD in 1995 for CFD research. He then joined Mentor Graphics Corporation, Mechanical Analysis Division (formerly Flomerics Ltd) as an application and support engineer, specializing in the application of CFD to electronics cooling and the design of the built environment. Having been the Product Marketing Manager responsible for the FloTHERM and FloVENT softwares he is now Market Development Manager for the Physical Design of Electronics in the Mechanical Analysis Division. Visit Robin Bornoff's blog

More Posts by Robin Bornoff

Comments 2

Post a Comment
I saw a very interesting analysis that you did with FloVENT, of a vertical wall and the effect of an air gap. I would be very interested to see what an analysis of insulation and an air gap would look like of a floor instead of a wall. I wonder what radiant and convective losses look like there. Thank you, -Blue Overture

Blue Overture
12:03 AM Dec 17, 2013

Here in the UK the groundworks are usually solid, I did look into the effect of insulation as part of the groundworls previously: If there were an air gap under the floor then the convective transfer of heat should be reduced (with the radiative portion increasing). I say 'should', have been wrong before, that's where simulation comes into its own to verify such intuitions.

Robin Bornoff
10:06 AM Dec 18, 2013

Add Your Comment

Please complete the following information to comment or sign in.

(Your email will not be published)


Online Chat