Sign In
Forgot Password?
Sign In | | Create Account

How much do ‘U-Value’ good thermal insulation? Part IV

100mm block, 50mm insulation, 50mm cavity air gap then 100mm block make up an external wall that in theory comply with a building regulation overall wall U-Value of 0.3 (W/m^2K). This got me thinking about the 50mm air gap. Why 50mm? What if it was 75mm or 10mm? Stagnant air is a great insulator, a small gap would tend to stagnate the air and might improve, reduce, the overall U-Value. A large gap would have lots of air, ok, it’d be moving more freely but intuitively a bigger gap should make it more difficult for the cold to penetrate from the outside. With FloVENT at my disposal I’d be mad to consider actually building some walls and doing some physical testing. CFD based software simulation makes such studies achievable, quickly, easily and requires no building skills (thank goodness as I have none).

  Someone once said that there’s no such thing as a single useful CFD simulation. It’s only when you start to look at variants of a model do you get the benefit of insight and understanding into why something behaves the way it does. Armed with this mentality I defined a parametric study in FloVENT’s ‘Command Center’ to set-up, simulate and compare the results of the effects of varying the gap size from 1mm to 100mm.

cavity_gap

The most obvious parameter to look at to see the effects of the gap size is the internal room temperature. The outside ambient air is fixed at 2degC, a fixed power dissipation is set inside the room to represent a heater and the model set up such that that heat (W) can only go through the vertical external wall. Here’s the resulting plot of room temperature vs. cavity air gap size:

room_temp

The vertical dotted line shows the original gap size. There is a small improvement in overall resistance at about a 30mm gap size but then the resistance goes down (U-Value goes up) dramatically as the gap size reduces. Most interesting though is the observation that after 50mm, there is no effect on the overall resistance. I’d like to think that numerous studies by a building control and regulation engineer arrived at this value and also that he was using FloVENT to do so!

U-Value is a measure of the ease by which heat can pass through something. The required maximum overall U-value of 0.3 is for the entire wall construction, from room temperature to outside temperature. Local U-Values can be determined at any point (rather vertical plane) within the wall. A U-Value exists for the left side of the cavity air gap, where the heat passes from the insulation to the air. Another U-Value exists for the inner surface of the outer wall, where the heat passes from the air gap to the outer wall. Plotting the variation in these two U-Values with gap size provides further insights…

u_values

Heat passes very easily from the insulation to the air when the gap size is reduced. For the inner surface of the outer wall the opposite is true, a little. If you have say two U-Values indicating the ease by which heat passes sequentially through two stages you can combine these into a single U-Value that represents the overall U-Value for the cavity. Time for an equation and for that I’m sorry.

uvalue_equation

Using the above to combine the U-Values for two sides of the cavity we get:

combined_u_value

So, by isolating the effects of the cavity air gap on the overall U-Value we can at least observe that you can decrease the gap size to about 30mm without an adverse effect on increasing U-Value and having gap sizes up to 100mm (and extrapolated well beyond that) will have no subsequent beneficial or detrimental effects.

Hey, hold on Robin, you could have figured that out from your first room temperature vs. gap size plot! True young padawan but at least this way I’ve introduced how FloVENT can be used to drill down to specific areas of a model to start to find out why the U-Value changes as it does. What is special about the heat transfer from the insulation to the air? Why is that much more sensitive to the gap size? Why is it that the gap size has no effect when > 50mm? All good questions, to be answered next time.

17th Febrary 2010, Nottingham

CFD, FloVENT, Cavity Wall, HVAC, U-Value

More Blog Posts

About Robin Bornoff Follow on Twitter

Robin BornoffRobin Bornoff achieved a Mechanical Engineering Degree from Brunel University in 1992 followed by a PhD in 1995 for CFD research. He then joined Mentor Graphics Corporation, Mechanical Analysis Division (formerly Flomerics Ltd) as an application and support engineer, specializing in the application of CFD to electronics cooling and the design of the built environment. Having been the Product Marketing Manager responsible for the FloTHERM and FloVENT softwares he is now Market Development Manager for the Physical Design of Electronics in the Mechanical Analysis Division. Visit Robin Bornoff's blog

More Posts by Robin Bornoff

Comments 3

Post a Comment
I would like to know the effect on U value of introducing multiple air gaps between films (both clear or reflective)

Andy Robb
3:05 PM Feb 27, 2010

Andy, interesting request. I have not yet covered the aspects of radiative transfer across the wall and cavity. As I'll come on to shortly, any way of stagnating the air is highly beneficial so long as those methods are not countered by an increase in conductive U-value. All investigatable (?) with FloVENT of course!

Robin Bornoff
8:08 AM Mar 1, 2010

[...] that come begging after observing the FloVENT simulation results discussed in the previous blog posting. Let’s find [...]

Add Your Comment

Please complete the following information to comment or sign in.

(Your email will not be published)

Archives

 
Online Chat