Sign In
Forgot Password?
Sign In | | Create Account

The art of modelling using CFD. Part IV - Fans

Sometimes the ability to apply artistic interpretation of your virtual product to your simulation model of it is limited or dictated (take your pick) by the available capabilities of that simulation tool. CFD simulation is quite a young technology, application to electronics cooling newer still, a mere 21 years old. Always pushing the limit of available computing resource, always adapting to the ever increasing need for accurate AND fast predictions, such tools continue to adapt. Couple this to the prevalence, and relative complexity, of fans in electronics cooling and you’ll be faced with a few options regarding their representation.

The use of the term ‘compact model’ is used extensively in the electronics cooling simulation field. ‘Compact model’, a tautology if ever there was one! All models are compact to some degree, they are never ‘more’ than the reality they represent, just reflections of it. For fans you have two options (well, in some tools) either represent the blades and their rotation explicitly, a detailed representation so to say, or use a compact representation of the fan. A compact representation will have the following characteristics:

  • Have the same key behaviours as the real object
  • Be computationally efficient
  • Require a small amount of data to characterise it

A fan spec sheet nearly always contains characteristic information that can be used to define a compact model; the fan curve, a graph that relates the pressure drop over the fan vs. the flow rate of air that fan can push through itself under those pressure conditions. Beyond that you’ll just want to know the outer (cowling) diameter, the hub diameter and thickness. O, and the rmp it rotates at, that info can be used by the simulation software to determine how much the air swirls round as it comes out of the fan. Nice and simple.

 fan_vs_fan

OK, what are the pros and cons of either method? Well, a fan curve is not totally BCI (boundary condition independent). It will be valid for the test environment it was measured in, less valid when say the fan is placed real close to a plate. Some manufacturers provide some indication of exactly how the fan curve is degraded under such circumstances, most don’t. A detailed model of a fan, with the blades defined in all their glorious 3Dness will not suffer such fan curve issues. However it does strike me that it must be awfully difficult to get hold of a 3D cad model of the blades, they’re like snowflakes, unique and real difficult to get hold of, they certainly aren’t available with the spec sheet. I also doubt the fan manufacturer would want to provide such 3D cad data, you’re more than likely go off and manufacture it ;)

You really don’t want to be putting a fan so close to something as to invalidate its fan curve. Compact fan models are nearly always good enough. Beware of CFD tools that lead with the ability to model fans in detail, it’s quite possible they do so because it looks better, it looks more accurate, rather than providing better value in terms of accuracy and overall time required to use.

If you don’t believe me just stare at the image below intently for a couple of minutes. Yes, you are feeling drowsy, sleeeeepyyy….

fan_look_into_my_eyes

20th May 2010, Ross-on-Wye

modelling, compact model, Electronics Cooling, BCI, Model, Modeling, Fan

More Blog Posts

About Robin Bornoff Follow on Twitter

Robin BornoffRobin Bornoff achieved a Mechanical Engineering Degree from Brunel University in 1992 followed by a PhD in 1995 for CFD research. He then joined Mentor Graphics Corporation, Mechanical Analysis Division (formerly Flomerics Ltd) as an application and support engineer, specializing in the application of CFD to electronics cooling and the design of the built environment. He is now the Product Marketing Manager responsible for the FloTHERM and FloVENT softwares. Visit Robin Bornoff's blog

More Posts by Robin Bornoff

Comments 2

Post a Comment
HAs any study been made on cellular base station designs to reduce heat buildup inside the container by utilising "leaky"construction methods that you are aware of? regards Peter

Peter Stockwell
9:03 AM Jun 9, 2010

There have been numerous thermal and air flow studies of base stations using FloTHERM for issues such as transient response to fan failure, air flow baffling, plenum height optimisation, fan sizing and locating etc. Nothing that I'm aware of in terms of leakage cooling. I would assume issues such as dust and humidity would constrain such cooling methods.

Robin Bornoff
12:34 PM Jun 9, 2010

Add Your Comment

Please complete the following information to comment or sign in.

(Your email will not be published)

Archives

Tags

 
Online Chat